Raptor advice

[|AFF|Soupyblister]

I have a WD 230GB SATA drive, I am thinking about getting a raptor drive and load my OS on it with my MOST play video games, BF2 and put all my media and video on the other one. Just want to know if I get this will my other hard drive have ANY effect on it performance?

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Which raptor are you looking at? The way you phrased your question is kind of odd, do you mean will your old drive affect the raptors performance?

[|AFF|Soupyblister]

Which raptor are you looking at? The way you phrased your question is kind of odd, do you mean will your old drive affect the raptors performance?

I am looking at this one. And yes will my old drive running as slave, which I know that SATA does not need a master or slave, but it will run second. Have any effect or performance issue? If so what you all suggest?

[lil_jimmy_norton]

No, shouldn't be any issues.

[|AFF|Soupyblister]

No, shouldn't be any issues.

Thanks Jimmy,

[LoD]

It will run just fine, like jimmy said. Still, its only going to shave off a few seconds on load times, and bootup etc...

You seem to have a really kick *** computer, so a raptor might make sense to get that extra mile of performance, but I would probably hold off personally. A dual core upgrade would probably yeild more performance improvements outside of games.

I'm pretty much anti raptor unless you have everything else, and you seem to qualify for a raptor under my rules but im still not a fan of one.

[lil_jimmy_norton]

It will run just fine, like jimmy said. Still, its only going to shave off a few seconds on load times, and bootup etc...

You seem to have a really kick *** computer, so a raptor might make sense to get that extra mile of performance, but I would probably hold off personally. A dual core upgrade would probably yeild more performance improvements outside of games.

I'm pretty much anti raptor unless you have everything else, and you seem to qualify for a raptor under my rules but im still not a fan of one.

I used to feel the same way, but I'm going to be picking up one of the 150GB raptors soon.

[|AFF|Soupyblister]

It will run just fine, like jimmy said. Still, its only going to shave off a few seconds on load times, and bootup etc...

You seem to have a really kick *** computer, so a raptor might make sense to get that extra mile of performance, but I would probably hold off personally. A dual core upgrade would probably yeild more performance improvements outside of games.

I'm pretty much anti raptor unless you have everything else, and you seem to qualify for a raptor under my rules but im still not a fan of one.

Funny you say that, I just ordered my AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU also. Do not want to hear about the Opteron CPU's. I went with the FX for the LONG term. At least 3 years I will get my best out of it. Should get it by Monday or Tues. Also thinking about adding another Gig of ram, that should end my upgrading for a LONG time.

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Funny you say that, I just ordered my AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU also. Do not want to hear about the Opteron CPU's. I went with the FX for the LONG term. At least 3 years I will get my best out of it. Should get it by Monday or Tues. Also thinking about adding another Gig of ram, that should end my upgrading for a LONG time.

Haha, that's funny....

[|AFF|Soupyblister]

Haha, that's funny....

I knew you would say that norton.. I did some other post., to lazy to do a search, but you suggested Opteron CPU for me.. so I saw this coming. Although I do appreciate you input and advice.

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Just out of curiosity why did you choose the FX?

[|AFF|Soupyblister]

Just out of curiosity why did you choose the FX?

I read the reviews and looked at the bench marks.

[lil_jimmy_norton]

I read the reviews and looked at the bench marks.

So buying the opteron 180 that would perform the same and was $400 less didn't appeal to you?

[|AFF|Soupyblister]

So buying the opteron 180 that would perform the same and was $400 less didn't appeal to you?

Well....I can not prove that this FX can out perform the 180. Its late and don't fell like looking for proof. But if you can show me how the Opteron 180 can out perform the FX-60. Please do.

spec AMD OPTERON 180

Features:

# CPU ID Dual-Core AMD Opteron™ Processor Model 180
# Model 180
# Ordering Parts Number (OPN) OSA180CDBOX
# Stepping E6
# Frequency 2.4GHz
# HyperTransport™ Technology Speed 1000MHz
# Integrated Memory Controller 2.4GHz
# Core Voltage 1.3 V/1.35 V
# Case Temperature 49° C to 65° C
# Wattage 110.0W
# L2 Cache Size 2 MB
# L2 Cache Speed 2.4GHz
# Manf. Technology .09 micron SOI
# Socket Socket 939
# Amperage 80 A
# Manufacturer's Warranty 3 years

Spec: Athlon 64 60FX

Brand AMD
Series Athlon 64 FX
Model ADAFX60CDBOX
CPU Socket Type
CPU Socket Type Socket 939
Tech Spec
Core Toledo
Multi-Core Dual-Core
Name Athlon 64 FX60
Operating Frequency 2.6GHz
HT 1GHz
L1 Cache 128KB+128KB
L2 Cache 2 x 1MB
Process Type 90 nm
Hyper-Transport Support Yes
64 bit Support Yes
Multimedia Instruction MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNOW! Professional
Voltage 1.30-1.35V
Cooling Device Heatsink and Fan
2MB L2

Bus Speed
2000MHz

Additional Technologies
HyperTransport

Fan
Included

I know you will find something..please do not reget me spending a extra $400.00

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Only diffrence between the 2 is 200Mhz clock speed which can be fixed easily, gaurenteed.

The are essentaly the exact same processor.